Costa Rica vs Mexico: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Costa Rica
10.1%
in 2019
Mexico
9.5%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
153rd
Mexico rank
155th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Costa Rica
- Mexico
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 10.1% against 9.5% in Mexico, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mexico ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 153rd and Mexico ranks 155th of 194 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.2% | 11.4% | 1.2% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 9.3% | 9.4% | 0.1% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Costa Rica or Mexico?
- Costa Rica, at 10.1% against 9.5% in Mexico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Costa Rica and Mexico?
- 0.6%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mexico?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Mexico rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Costa Rica ranks 153rd and Mexico ranks 155th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.