Cook Islands vs Kiribati: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Cook Islands
19.0%
in 2019
Kiribati
18.8%
in 2019
Cook Islands rank
59th
Kiribati rank
62nd
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Cook Islands
- Kiribati
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 19.0% against 18.8% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kiribati ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 59th and Kiribati ranks 62nd of 194 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.1% | 18.3% | 0.2% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 18.4% | 18.4% | 0.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Cook Islands or Kiribati?
- Cook Islands, at 19.0% against 18.8% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Cook Islands and Kiribati?
- 0.2%, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Kiribati?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Cook Islands and Kiribati rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Cook Islands ranks 59th and Kiribati ranks 62nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.