Congo vs SEAR: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Congo
26.1%
in 2019
SEAR
23.5%
in 2019
Congo rank
3rd
SEAR rank
1st
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Congo
- SEAR
How they compare
Congo currently reports 26.1% against 23.5% in SEAR, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times SEAR's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 3rd and SEAR ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | SEAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.7% | 21.3% | 5.4% | Congo |
| 2010s | 26.5% | 22.7% | 3.9% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Congo or SEAR?
- Congo, at 26.1% against 23.5% in SEAR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Congo and SEAR?
- 2.6%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and SEAR?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Congo and SEAR rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Congo ranks 3rd and SEAR ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.