Chad vs Western Pacific (WHO region): Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Chad
24.8%
in 2019
Western Pacific (WHO region)
9.1%
in 2019
Chad rank
12th
Western Pacific (WHO region) rank
12th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Chad
- Western Pacific (WHO region)
How they compare
Chad currently reports 24.8% against 9.1% in Western Pacific (WHO region), a difference of 15.7%.
That makes Chad's figure about 2.7 times Western Pacific (WHO region)'s.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 12th and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 12th of 194 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Western Pacific (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.7% | 10.3% | 13.3% | Chad |
| 2010s | 24.3% | 8.9% | 15.4% | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Chad or Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- Chad, at 24.8% against 9.1% in Western Pacific (WHO region) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Chad and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 15.7%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Chad and Western Pacific (WHO region) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Chad ranks 12th and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 12th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.