Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Burkina Faso
24.0%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
23.7%
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
18th
Sri Lanka rank
20th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 24.0% against 23.7% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 20th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.6% | 25.0% | 1.4% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 23.7% | 23.6% | 0.1% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Burkina Faso or Sri Lanka?
- Burkina Faso, at 24.0% against 23.7% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
- 0.3%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Burkina Faso ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 20th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.