Botswana vs South Sudan: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Botswana
17.9%
in 2019
South Sudan
18.0%
in 2019
Botswana rank
78th
South Sudan rank
76th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Botswana
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 18.0% against 17.9% in Botswana, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 78th and South Sudan ranks 76th of 194 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.9% | 17.9% | 0.0% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 17.4% | 17.4% | 0.0% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Botswana or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 18.0% against 17.9% in Botswana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Botswana and South Sudan?
- 0.1%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and South Sudan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and South Sudan rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Botswana ranks 78th and South Sudan ranks 76th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.