Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kenya: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
15.8%
in 2019
Kenya
16.0%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
101st
Kenya rank
99th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 16.0% against 15.8% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Kenya ranks 99th of 194 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.8% | 19.3% | 4.5% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 15.5% | 15.8% | 0.4% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 16.0% against 15.8% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya?
- 0.2%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Kenya ranks 99th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.