Bolivia vs Peru: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Bolivia
14.6%
in 2019
Peru
14.7%
in 2019
Bolivia rank
117th
Peru rank
115th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Bolivia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 14.7% against 14.6% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Bolivia ranks 117th and Peru ranks 115th of 194 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.6% | 17.3% | 0.3% | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 15.6% | 13.9% | 1.7% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Bolivia or Peru?
- Peru, at 14.7% against 14.6% in Bolivia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Bolivia and Peru?
- 0.1%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Peru?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Peru rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Bolivia ranks 117th and Peru ranks 115th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.