Belgium vs Nicaragua: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Belgium
9.7%
in 2019
Nicaragua
10.3%
in 2019
Belgium rank
154th
Nicaragua rank
151st
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Belgium
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 10.3% against 9.7% in Belgium, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 154th and Nicaragua ranks 151st of 194 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.8% | 10.1% | 2.3% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 8.7% | 9.2% | 0.5% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Belgium or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 10.3% against 9.7% in Belgium as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Belgium and Nicaragua?
- 0.6%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nicaragua?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and Nicaragua rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Belgium ranks 154th and Nicaragua ranks 151st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.