Barbados vs Honduras: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Barbados
11.5%
in 2019
Honduras
11.7%
in 2019
Barbados rank
145th
Honduras rank
144th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Barbados
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 11.7% against 11.5% in Barbados, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Honduras ahead.
Barbados ranks 145th and Honduras ranks 144th of 194 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.3% | 11.8% | 0.5% | Barbados |
| 2010s | 11.3% | 11.0% | 0.3% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Barbados or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 11.7% against 11.5% in Barbados as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Barbados and Honduras?
- 0.2%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Honduras?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Honduras rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Barbados ranks 145th and Honduras ranks 144th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.