Barbados vs Brunei: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Barbados
11.5%
in 2019
Brunei
10.7%
in 2019
Barbados rank
145th
Brunei rank
147th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Barbados
- Brunei
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 11.5% against 10.7% in Brunei, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Brunei's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 145th and Brunei ranks 147th of 194 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Brunei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.3% | 9.8% | 2.5% | Barbados |
| 2010s | 11.3% | 9.8% | 1.5% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Barbados or Brunei?
- Barbados, at 11.5% against 10.7% in Brunei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Barbados and Brunei?
- 0.8%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Brunei?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Brunei rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Barbados ranks 145th and Brunei ranks 147th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.