Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Bahamas
10.2%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
10.5%
in 2019
Bahamas rank
152nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
149th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Bahamas
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 10.5% against 10.2% in Bahamas, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 152nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 149th of 194 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.6% | 12.0% | 1.4% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 9.6% | 10.4% | 0.8% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Bahamas or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 10.5% against 10.2% in Bahamas as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.3%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Bahamas ranks 152nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 149th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.