Bahamas vs Nicaragua: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Bahamas
10.2%
in 2019
Nicaragua
10.3%
in 2019
Bahamas rank
152nd
Nicaragua rank
151st
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Bahamas
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 10.3% against 10.2% in Bahamas, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Bahamas ranks 152nd and Nicaragua ranks 151st of 194 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.6% | 10.1% | 0.5% | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 9.6% | 9.2% | 0.4% | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Bahamas or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 10.3% against 10.2% in Bahamas as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Bahamas and Nicaragua?
- 0.1%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Nicaragua?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and Nicaragua rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Bahamas ranks 152nd and Nicaragua ranks 151st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.