Australia vs Iceland: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Australia
6.2%
in 2019
Iceland
7.2%
in 2019
Australia rank
191st
Iceland rank
188th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Australia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 7.2% against 6.2% in Australia, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 191st and Iceland ranks 188th of 194 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.6% | 6.4% | 0.8% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 5.8% | 6.7% | 1.0% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Australia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 7.2% against 6.2% in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Australia and Iceland?
- 1.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Australia ranks 191st and Iceland ranks 188th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.