Antigua and Barbuda vs Honduras: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Antigua and Barbuda
11.8%
in 2019
Honduras
11.7%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
143rd
Honduras rank
144th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Honduras
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 11.8% against 11.7% in Honduras, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 143rd and Honduras ranks 144th of 194 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.7% | 11.8% | 0.8% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 11.3% | 11.0% | 0.3% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Antigua and Barbuda or Honduras?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 11.8% against 11.7% in Honduras as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Antigua and Barbuda and Honduras?
- 0.1%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Honduras?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Honduras rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 143rd and Honduras ranks 144th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.