Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Antigua and Barbuda
11.8%
in 2019
Barbados
11.5%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
143rd
Barbados rank
145th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Barbados
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 11.8% against 11.5% in Barbados, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 143rd and Barbados ranks 145th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Barbados in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.7% | 12.3% | 0.4% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 11.3% | 11.3% | 0.0% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Antigua and Barbuda or Barbados?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 11.8% against 11.5% in Barbados as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
- 0.3%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 143rd and Barbados ranks 145th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.