AMR vs Chad: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
AMR
9.9%
in 2019
Chad
24.8%
in 2019
AMR rank
10th
Chad rank
12th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- AMR
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 24.8% against 9.9% in AMR, a difference of 14.9%.
That makes Chad's figure about 2.5 times AMR's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 10th and Chad ranks 12th of 13 groups.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.8% | 23.7% | 12.9% | Chad |
| 2010s | 9.8% | 24.3% | 14.5% | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), AMR or Chad?
- Chad, at 24.8% against 9.9% in AMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between AMR and Chad?
- 14.9%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Chad?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do AMR and Chad rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- AMR ranks 10th and Chad ranks 12th of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.