AFR vs Congo: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
AFR
20.6%
in 2019
Congo
26.1%
in 2019
AFR rank
3rd
Congo rank
3rd
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- AFR
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 26.1% against 20.6% in AFR, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times AFR's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 3rd and Congo ranks 3rd of 13 groups.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.6% | 26.7% | 6.1% | Congo |
| 2010s | 20.2% | 26.5% | 6.3% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), AFR or Congo?
- Congo, at 26.1% against 20.6% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between AFR and Congo?
- 5.5%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Congo?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Congo rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- AFR ranks 3rd and Congo ranks 3rd of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.