South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
South Sudan
981.2
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,177
in 2023
South Sudan rank
74th
Zimbabwe rank
71st
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,177 against 981.2 in South Sudan, a difference of 195.8.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 193 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 554 | 986.15 | 432.15 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 757.39 | 921.75 | 164.36 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 893.4 | 1,099 | 205.42 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,177 against 981.2 in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 195.8, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- South Sudan ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.