Samoa vs Saint Lucia: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Samoa
10.4
in 2023
Saint Lucia
9.6
in 2023
Samoa rank
174th
Saint Lucia rank
175th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Samoa
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 10.4 against 9.6 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.8.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Samoa ranks 174th and Saint Lucia ranks 175th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.95 | 9.09 | 1.14 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 8.55 | 8.11 | 0.44 | Samoa |
| 2020s | 9.97 | 9.25 | 0.725 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Samoa or Saint Lucia?
- Samoa, at 10.4 against 9.6 in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Samoa and Saint Lucia?
- 0.8, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Saint Lucia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Samoa and Saint Lucia rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Samoa ranks 174th and Saint Lucia ranks 175th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.