Romania vs Zimbabwe: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Romania
1,000
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,177
in 2023
Romania rank
72nd
Zimbabwe rank
71st
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Romania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,177 against 1,000 in Romania, a difference of 177.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,141 | 986.15 | 155.11 | Romania |
| 2010s | 991.36 | 921.75 | 69.61 | Romania |
| 2020s | 973.42 | 1,099 | 125.4 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Romania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,177 against 1,000 in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 177, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Romania and Zimbabwe rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Romania ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.