Norway vs Uruguay: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Norway
200.7
in 2023
Uruguay
199.2
in 2023
Norway rank
130th
Uruguay rank
131st
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Norway
- Uruguay
How they compare
Norway currently reports 200.7 against 199.2 in Uruguay, a difference of 1.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uruguay ahead.
Norway ranks 130th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 132.07 | 150.94 | 18.87 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 155.29 | 164.79 | 9.5 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 187.97 | 190.85 | 2.88 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Norway or Uruguay?
- Norway, at 200.7 against 199.2 in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Norway and Uruguay?
- 1.5, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Uruguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Norway and Uruguay rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Norway ranks 130th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.