Nauru vs Tuvalu: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Nauru
0.7
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.5
in 2023
Nauru rank
190th
Tuvalu rank
192nd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Nauru
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0.7 against 0.5 in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.2.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.4 times Tuvalu's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Nauru ranks 190th and Tuvalu ranks 192nd of 193 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.53 | 0.5 | 0.03 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 0.625 | 0.5 | 0.125 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Nauru or Tuvalu?
- Nauru, at 0.7 against 0.5 in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Nauru and Tuvalu?
- 0.2, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tuvalu?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Tuvalu rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Nauru ranks 190th and Tuvalu ranks 192nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.