Nauru vs San Marino: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Nauru
0.7
in 2023
San Marino
1.1
in 2023
Nauru rank
190th
San Marino rank
187th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Nauru
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 1.1 against 0.7 in Nauru, a difference of 0.4.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.6 times Nauru's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 190th and San Marino ranks 187th of 193 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5 | 0.88 | 0.38 | San Marino |
| 2010s | 0.53 | 0.98 | 0.45 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 0.625 | 1.08 | 0.45 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Nauru or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 1.1 against 0.7 in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Nauru and San Marino?
- 0.4, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and San Marino?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and San Marino rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Nauru ranks 190th and San Marino ranks 187th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.