Nauru vs Palau: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Nauru
0.7
in 2023
Palau
1
in 2023
Nauru rank
190th
Palau rank
188th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Nauru
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 1 against 0.7 in Nauru, a difference of 0.3.
That makes Palau's figure about 1.4 times Nauru's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 190th and Palau ranks 188th of 193 countries.
Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5 | 1.15 | 0.65 | Palau |
| 2010s | 0.53 | 0.99 | 0.46 | Palau |
| 2020s | 0.625 | 0.975 | 0.35 | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Nauru or Palau?
- Palau, at 1 against 0.7 in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Nauru and Palau?
- 0.3, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Palau?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Palau rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Nauru ranks 190th and Palau ranks 188th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.