Namibia vs Uruguay: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Namibia
187.7
in 2023
Uruguay
199.2
in 2023
Namibia rank
132nd
Uruguay rank
131st
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Namibia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 199.2 against 187.7 in Namibia, a difference of 11.5.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 132nd and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 111.41 | 150.94 | 39.53 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 119.78 | 164.79 | 45.01 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 169.28 | 190.85 | 21.57 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Namibia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 199.2 against 187.7 in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Namibia and Uruguay?
- 11.5, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uruguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and Uruguay rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Namibia ranks 132nd and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.