Mongolia vs New Zealand: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Mongolia
155.2
in 2023
New Zealand
145.7
in 2023
Mongolia rank
141st
New Zealand rank
142nd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Mongolia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 155.2 against 145.7 in New Zealand, a difference of 9.5.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 141st and New Zealand ranks 142nd of 193 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 165.57 | 91.57 | 74 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 154.58 | 107.71 | 46.87 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 150.35 | 137.45 | 12.9 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Mongolia or New Zealand?
- Mongolia, at 155.2 against 145.7 in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Mongolia and New Zealand?
- 9.5, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and New Zealand rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Mongolia ranks 141st and New Zealand ranks 142nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.