Monaco vs Nauru: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Monaco
1
in 2023
Nauru
0.7
in 2023
Monaco rank
188th
Nauru rank
190th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Monaco
- Nauru
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 1 against 0.7 in Nauru, a difference of 0.3.
That makes Monaco's figure about 1.4 times Nauru's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Monaco ranks 188th and Nauru ranks 190th of 193 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.79 | 0.5 | 0.29 | Monaco |
| 2010s | 0.76 | 0.53 | 0.23 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 0.875 | 0.625 | 0.25 | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Monaco or Nauru?
- Monaco, at 1 against 0.7 in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Monaco and Nauru?
- 0.3, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Nauru?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Monaco and Nauru rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Monaco ranks 188th and Nauru ranks 190th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.