Moldova vs Uruguay: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Moldova
204.3
in 2023
Uruguay
199.2
in 2023
Moldova rank
129th
Uruguay rank
131st
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Moldova
- Uruguay
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 204.3 against 199.2 in Uruguay, a difference of 5.1.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 129th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 290.47 | 150.94 | 139.53 | Moldova |
| 2010s | 213.46 | 164.79 | 48.67 | Moldova |
| 2020s | 195.43 | 190.85 | 4.58 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Moldova or Uruguay?
- Moldova, at 204.3 against 199.2 in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Moldova and Uruguay?
- 5.1, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Uruguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Moldova and Uruguay rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Moldova ranks 129th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.