Mauritius vs East Timor: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Mauritius
106.8
in 2023
East Timor
105.2
in 2023
Mauritius rank
148th
East Timor rank
149th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Mauritius
- East Timor
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 106.8 against 105.2 in East Timor, a difference of 1.6.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 148th and East Timor ranks 149th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.76 | 63.52 | 0.76 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 77.49 | 77.66 | 0.17 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 100.12 | 98.65 | 1.47 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Mauritius or East Timor?
- Mauritius, at 106.8 against 105.2 in East Timor as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Mauritius and East Timor?
- 1.6, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and East Timor?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and East Timor rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Mauritius ranks 148th and East Timor ranks 149th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.