Malta vs Samoa: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Malta
19.1
in 2023
Samoa
10.4
in 2023
Malta rank
171st
Samoa rank
174th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Malta
- Samoa
How they compare
Malta currently reports 19.1 against 10.4 in Samoa, a difference of 8.7.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.8 times Samoa's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 171st and Samoa ranks 174th of 193 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.46 | 7.95 | 3.51 | Malta |
| 2010s | 12.5 | 8.55 | 3.95 | Malta |
| 2020s | 17.9 | 9.97 | 7.92 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Malta or Samoa?
- Malta, at 19.1 against 10.4 in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Malta and Samoa?
- 8.7, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Samoa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Samoa rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Malta ranks 171st and Samoa ranks 174th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.