Lithuania vs New Zealand: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Lithuania
142.3
in 2023
New Zealand
145.7
in 2023
Lithuania rank
143rd
New Zealand rank
142nd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Lithuania
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 145.7 against 142.3 in Lithuania, a difference of 3.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 143rd and New Zealand ranks 142nd of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 168.15 | 91.57 | 76.58 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 135.04 | 107.71 | 27.33 | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 133.3 | 137.45 | 4.15 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Lithuania or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 145.7 against 142.3 in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Lithuania and New Zealand?
- 3.4, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and New Zealand rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Lithuania ranks 143rd and New Zealand ranks 142nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.