Libya vs Rwanda: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Libya
560.1
in 2023
Rwanda
563
in 2023
Libya rank
96th
Rwanda rank
95th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Libya
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 563 against 560.1 in Libya, a difference of 2.9.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 96th and Rwanda ranks 95th of 193 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 482.48 | 380.78 | 101.7 | Libya |
| 2010s | 498.96 | 393.38 | 105.58 | Libya |
| 2020s | 542.33 | 513.4 | 28.93 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Libya or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 563 against 560.1 in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Libya and Rwanda?
- 2.9, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Rwanda rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Libya ranks 96th and Rwanda ranks 95th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.