Liberia vs Rwanda: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Liberia
565.5
in 2023
Rwanda
563
in 2023
Liberia rank
94th
Rwanda rank
95th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Liberia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 565.5 against 563 in Rwanda, a difference of 2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Liberia ranks 94th and Rwanda ranks 95th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 373.6 | 380.78 | 7.18 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 434.39 | 393.38 | 41.01 | Liberia |
| 2020s | 528.7 | 513.4 | 15.3 | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Liberia or Rwanda?
- Liberia, at 565.5 against 563 in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Liberia and Rwanda?
- 2.5, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Rwanda rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Liberia ranks 94th and Rwanda ranks 95th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.