Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Latvia
83.3
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
84.4
in 2023
Latvia rank
154th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
153rd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Latvia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 84.4 against 83.3 in Latvia, a difference of 1.1.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 154th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 153rd of 193 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 112.1 | 89.75 | 22.35 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 87.28 | 73.13 | 14.15 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 81.78 | 81 | 0.775 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Latvia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 84.4 against 83.3 in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.1, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Latvia ranks 154th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 153rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.