Kiribati vs Saint Lucia: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Kiribati
9.2
in 2023
Saint Lucia
9.6
in 2023
Kiribati rank
176th
Saint Lucia rank
175th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Kiribati
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 9.6 against 9.2 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.4.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 176th and Saint Lucia ranks 175th of 193 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.22 | 9.09 | 2.87 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 7.57 | 8.11 | 0.54 | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 8.72 | 9.25 | 0.525 | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Kiribati or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 9.6 against 9.2 in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Kiribati and Saint Lucia?
- 0.4, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Lucia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Saint Lucia rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Kiribati ranks 176th and Saint Lucia ranks 175th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.