Kiribati vs Samoa: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Kiribati
9.2
in 2023
Samoa
10.4
in 2023
Kiribati rank
176th
Samoa rank
174th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 10.4 against 9.2 in Kiribati, a difference of 1.2.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 176th and Samoa ranks 174th of 193 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.22 | 7.95 | 1.73 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 7.57 | 8.55 | 0.98 | Samoa |
| 2020s | 8.72 | 9.97 | 1.25 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Kiribati or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 10.4 against 9.2 in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 1.2, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Kiribati ranks 176th and Samoa ranks 174th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.