Kiribati vs Micronesia (country): Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Kiribati
9.2
in 2023
Micronesia (country)
6.2
in 2023
Kiribati rank
176th
Micronesia (country) rank
178th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Kiribati
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 9.2 against 6.2 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 3.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times Micronesia (country)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 176th and Micronesia (country) ranks 178th of 193 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.22 | 4.72 | 1.5 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 7.57 | 5.01 | 2.56 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 8.72 | 5.9 | 2.82 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Kiribati or Micronesia (country)?
- Kiribati, at 9.2 against 6.2 in Micronesia (country) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Kiribati and Micronesia (country)?
- 3, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Micronesia (country)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Micronesia (country) rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Kiribati ranks 176th and Micronesia (country) ranks 178th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.