Jordan vs South Sudan: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Jordan
967.8
in 2023
South Sudan
981.2
in 2023
Jordan rank
75th
South Sudan rank
74th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Jordan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 981.2 against 967.8 in Jordan, a difference of 13.4.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Sudan ahead.
Jordan ranks 75th and South Sudan ranks 74th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 387.94 | 554 | 166.06 | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 677.96 | 757.39 | 79.43 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 922.55 | 893.4 | 29.15 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Jordan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 981.2 against 967.8 in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Jordan and South Sudan?
- 13.4, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Sudan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and South Sudan rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Jordan ranks 75th and South Sudan ranks 74th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.