India vs Sur: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
India
204,596
in 2023
Sur
35
in 2023
India rank
1st
Sur rank
2nd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- India
- Sur
How they compare
India currently reports 204,596 against 35 in Sur, a difference of 204,561.
That makes India's figure about 5,845.6 times Sur's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
India ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 142,964 | 31.03 | 142,933 | India |
| 2010s | 173,175 | 28.06 | 173,147 | India |
| 2020s | 198,764 | 33.02 | 198,731 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, India or Sur?
- India, at 204,596 against 35 in Sur as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between India and Sur?
- 204,561, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Sur?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do India and Sur rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- India ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.