Grenada vs Kiribati: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Grenada
6.2
in 2023
Kiribati
9.2
in 2023
Grenada rank
178th
Kiribati rank
176th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Grenada
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 9.2 against 6.2 in Grenada, a difference of 3.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 178th and Kiribati ranks 176th of 193 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.08 | 6.22 | 0.14 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 5.35 | 7.57 | 2.22 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 5.92 | 8.72 | 2.8 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Grenada or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 9.2 against 6.2 in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Grenada and Kiribati?
- 3, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Kiribati?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Kiribati rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Grenada ranks 178th and Kiribati ranks 176th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.