Finland vs New Zealand: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Finland
157
in 2023
New Zealand
145.7
in 2023
Finland rank
140th
New Zealand rank
142nd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Finland
- New Zealand
How they compare
Finland currently reports 157 against 145.7 in New Zealand, a difference of 11.3.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 140th and New Zealand ranks 142nd of 193 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.4 | 91.57 | 7.83 | Finland |
| 2010s | 114.16 | 107.71 | 6.45 | Finland |
| 2020s | 145.07 | 137.45 | 7.62 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Finland or New Zealand?
- Finland, at 157 against 145.7 in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Finland and New Zealand?
- 11.3, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Finland ranks 140th and New Zealand ranks 142nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.