Finland vs Jamaica: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Finland
157
in 2023
Jamaica
171
in 2023
Finland rank
140th
Jamaica rank
138th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Finland
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 171 against 157 in Finland, a difference of 14.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 140th and Jamaica ranks 138th of 193 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.4 | 161.44 | 62.04 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 114.16 | 145.32 | 31.16 | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 145.07 | 163.45 | 18.38 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Finland or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 171 against 157 in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Finland and Jamaica?
- 14, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Jamaica?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Jamaica rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Finland ranks 140th and Jamaica ranks 138th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.