Ecuador vs South Sudan: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Ecuador
956.8
in 2023
South Sudan
981.2
in 2023
Ecuador rank
77th
South Sudan rank
74th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Ecuador
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 981.2 against 956.8 in Ecuador, a difference of 24.4.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 77th and South Sudan ranks 74th of 193 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 767.57 | 554 | 213.57 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 766.7 | 757.39 | 9.31 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 918.17 | 893.4 | 24.77 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Ecuador or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 981.2 against 956.8 in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 24.4, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Ecuador ranks 77th and South Sudan ranks 74th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.