Cyprus vs Maldives: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Cyprus
55.1
in 2023
Maldives
49.9
in 2023
Cyprus rank
161st
Maldives rank
163rd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Cyprus
- Maldives
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 55.1 against 49.9 in Maldives, a difference of 5.2.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Maldives ahead.
Cyprus ranks 161st and Maldives ranks 163rd of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.47 | 36.65 | 4.18 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 41.59 | 45.59 | 4 | Maldives |
| 2020s | 51.78 | 49.27 | 2.5 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Cyprus or Maldives?
- Cyprus, at 55.1 against 49.9 in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Cyprus and Maldives?
- 5.2, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Maldives?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Maldives rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Cyprus ranks 161st and Maldives ranks 163rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.