Cuba vs Rwanda: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Cuba
523.6
in 2023
Rwanda
563
in 2023
Cuba rank
98th
Rwanda rank
95th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Cuba
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 563 against 523.6 in Cuba, a difference of 39.4.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 95th of 193 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 725.79 | 380.78 | 345.01 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 542.98 | 393.38 | 149.6 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 517.1 | 513.4 | 3.7 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Cuba or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 563 against 523.6 in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Cuba and Rwanda?
- 39.4, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Rwanda rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Cuba ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 95th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.