Cuba vs Libya: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Cuba
523.6
in 2023
Libya
560.1
in 2023
Cuba rank
98th
Libya rank
96th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Cuba
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 560.1 against 523.6 in Cuba, a difference of 36.5.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 98th and Libya ranks 96th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 725.79 | 482.48 | 243.31 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 542.98 | 498.96 | 44.02 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 517.1 | 542.33 | 25.23 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Cuba or Libya?
- Libya, at 560.1 against 523.6 in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Cuba and Libya?
- 36.5, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Libya?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Libya rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Cuba ranks 98th and Libya ranks 96th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.