Costa Rica vs Uruguay: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Costa Rica
178.3
in 2023
Uruguay
199.2
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
134th
Uruguay rank
131st
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Costa Rica
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 199.2 against 178.3 in Costa Rica, a difference of 20.9.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 134th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 143.41 | 150.94 | 7.53 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 131.71 | 164.79 | 33.08 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 164.95 | 190.85 | 25.9 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Costa Rica or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 199.2 against 178.3 in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Costa Rica and Uruguay?
- 20.9, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Uruguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Uruguay rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Costa Rica ranks 134th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.