Costa Rica vs Namibia: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Costa Rica
178.3
in 2023
Namibia
187.7
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
134th
Namibia rank
132nd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Costa Rica
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 187.7 against 178.3 in Costa Rica, a difference of 9.4.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 134th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 143.41 | 111.41 | 32 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 131.71 | 119.78 | 11.93 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 164.95 | 169.28 | 4.33 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Costa Rica or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 187.7 against 178.3 in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 9.4, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Namibia rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Costa Rica ranks 134th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.