Costa Rica vs Equatorial Guinea: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Costa Rica
178.3
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
171.4
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
134th
Equatorial Guinea rank
137th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Costa Rica
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 178.3 against 171.4 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 6.9.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 134th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 137th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 143.41 | 100.03 | 43.38 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 131.71 | 134.95 | 3.24 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 164.95 | 163.72 | 1.22 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Costa Rica or Equatorial Guinea?
- Costa Rica, at 178.3 against 171.4 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea?
- 6.9, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Costa Rica ranks 134th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 137th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.